A way round Skelton Grange bridge

Earlier this week, Leeds City Council confirmed there will shortly be a feasibility study into re-routing the south Leeds canalside cycle path through Thwaite Mills museum. This would bypass the notorious barrier of Skelton Grange bridge, which significantly limits access along the route. As a resident of Woodlesford and member of Leeds Cycling Campaign, I found much to be encouraged by this news.

For the first time in the long-running saga of Skelton Grange bridge, there is now a firm proposal on the table. Many alternative options have been mooted – such as a new bridge, a long diversion or making adjustments to the existing bridge. But none of these could be implemented soon and guarantee full access. There is now a way forward, and one that already has some momentum behind it. This is most welcome – the big increase in usage of the path in the last 2 years means that a resolution has never been more urgent.

In the first instance, a fully-accessible path through Thwaite Mills would be best for existing users of the route (both on foot and wheel). Not only would it bypass both sides of Skelton Grange bridge, but also the awkward bridge on Thwaite Lane. It would also take the most efficient line, cutting around 100 metres off the current route. Plus it would create a pleasant public space, introducing the important heritage assets of Thwaite Mills to users of the path.

But perhaps just as important, there are significant opportunities for Thwaite Mills itself. Prior to COVID, access to the site was carefully controlled, with the museum’s income primarily coming from school groups, guided tours and booked events (such as weddings). But during COVID the museum has been closed, and considerable uncertainty remains regarding the return of groups and gatherings to venues like this. Meanwhile, as part of its efforts to address its £119m budget gap, the Council has recently consulted on reducing public opening hours at Thwaite Mills. Opening up access could provide new income streams from “passing trade”, such as a cafe and visitors to the museum itself.

In addition, security of the site could be improved. Having people regularly passing through would provide informal vigilance, and minimise any risks to these historic buildings. Clearly, the design of any route should take security and heritage issues (plus the moorings along the canalside) into account.

Thwaite Mills’ website describes it as being “set on an island of its very own, hidden away in the south of Leeds”. In fact, much of the riverside between Leeds and Woodlesford was “hidden away” until recently. But the extensive improvements to the cycle path – and the hugely increased usage of it during the 12 months of COVID – has quite literally opened up a side of Leeds previously unknown to many of its residents. It’s now a pleasant and popular route, taking in many points of interest such as Leeds Dock, Knostrop Weir, Skelton Lake and Woodlesford Lock. Providing access through Thwaite Mills would complete a long-running programme of bringing Leeds’ canalside into the public domain. Of benefit to public and museum alike.

To show your support for this proposal, sign the petition for a fully accessible path at Skelton Grange bridge, or flag up the issue on either the Commonplace or WYCA interactive maps (postcode LS10 1RP).

3 thoughts on “A way round Skelton Grange bridge

  1. While I understand how inaccessible the steps to many users are on the Skelton Road bridge, there is a plan to upgrade this bridge for the development on the old Skelton Power Station. Surely this upgrade could include something suitable for cyclists/parents with push chairs/people with mobility difficulties. As someone who has moored at Thwaite Mills museum for many years, I really do not think it is a good idea to open the site up to everyone. We have had well and truly more than our fair share of thefts and antisocial behaviour over the years and have spent a lot of time and money securing the museum to reduce this. Not only have thousands of pounds worth of belongings been stolen from the boaters and Canal Connections charity, but exhibits at the museum have been stolen/vandalised. If a path is put through the museum, it will make it far more easy for people to commit these crimes. This may sound selfish, but there are other options. This plan will solve the steps issue, but cause massive problems for the museum and the boaters who moor there.

    Like

    • Hi Dan, thank you for commenting. Obviously this is a question that affects you personally, and by comparison I can only comment as an interested impartial observer. I see this case as being very much about the wider public interest, so for me your key point is about the potential risk to the museum buildings (6 Grade II listed buildings, I believe) and exhibits. I note that up to now the site has had limited access, but has suffered security issues….. and so I’ve speculated in the blog that opening up the site to a constant stream of passers-by may improve security through informal vigilance. I appreciate that this implies a completely new way of managing the site…. but with COVID this may be on the cards anyway (Council cuts, museum closed, uncertainty re return of groups/guided tours/events, increased use of cycle path). In other words, potentially as much an opportunity as a threat.

      With regards your specific point about upgrading the existing bridge, yes there is a requirement in the planning permission for the Power Station site for the developer to add a ramp down to the canal….. however, this still does not provide access to the required standard, and also may not happen for many years.

      Hope that’s reasonable – no easy answers with this one, I appreciate! Dave

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s